I get that people think the voting machines are corrupt and that those counting the votes are corrupt and that the whole damn system is corrupt - Democrats have insisted that this is the case these past four years so why should they get upset if you now believe their arguments these past four years?Īs I’ve said on air many times, of course Democrats are going to cheat. Unaccountable mail-in ballots would be mandated, a step towards federalizing elections that the Founders explicitly protected as a states’s rights issue. A Democrat-controlled Senate means an expanded Supreme Court (in order to make up for losing the 2016 election and as of such, SCOTUS nominations, Democrats hope to make up for it by adding seats to the court and breezing through nominees), gun restrictions on an unforeseen scale, massive new taxes, and who knows what we’d get with foreign policy now that Iran is bragging about their resumed enrichment activity. Never mind that this would require a Constitutional amendment, when has law and order stopped those seeking to authoritatively expand their power? Democrats think they can do the same with Puerto Rico, although it may backfire. statehood, a ploy Republicans say is the Democrats’s way of expanding their congressional influence by adding seats. While mere truth offends the Marxists, I’m not given to hyperbole in such instances as these. The future of the republic hangs in the balance and with it chances of anything beyond one party control. (It should be noted that Trafalgar is the pollster that correctly predicted Trump’s victory in 2016.)

The deep breath before the plunge